While I do not necessarily dispute the premise in and of itself, the author's reasoning could not have been more off-the-mark. The main argument in the piece was that neither Obama nor Gillard are "radical" enough to overcome cynical detractors in opposition parties whose only goal is to derail the political ambitions of the two respective leaders.
The author cites GOP opposition to Obama's "Jobs Bill", in particular his unsubstantiated proposal to cut payroll taxes. What Pesek conveniently fails to mention are the accompanying tax and spending increases that render the proposal a net increase in the size and scope of the U.S. federal government.
The following passage from the article best synopsizes the author's misguided logic:
"The only answer for Gillard and Obama is to get radical -- be bold, think big and fight for your ideals. Neither leader seems set to do that, or able to sell their messages."William Pesek obviously isn't all that attuned to U.S. politics. Obama is by far and without question the most radical president in the history of the United States. Republicans oppose his policies not because they want nothing more than to obstruct him, but because his policies are genuinely bad ideas that have already been tried (two stimulus bills, cash for clunkers, auto and bank bailouts, etc.). The reality is that to Obama, "economic stimulus" translates to "multibillion dollar slush fund for violent union thug donors".
He is the most hyper-partisan president in the nation's history, and indisputably the most corrupt --- and by a wide margin. Never before has a president tripled the nation's debt for no purpose other than to redistribute trillions of dollars in confiscated wealth to campaign donors and political allies. Obama has done so at the direct expense of the American economy.
Most Republicans are not saboteurs, and thus are not motivated to destroy the country and its economy. Anyone who doubts that Obama's treacherous policies and initiatives are designed to do just that is either naive or badly uninformed.
What is impressive for me though in the article you have shared with us is the following paragraph
ReplyDelete""The only answer for Gillard and Obama is to get radical -- be bold, think big and fight for your ideals. Neither leader seems set to do that, or able to sell their messages.""
If you want to feel better, I suggest you read the column today in the Gerry Seib Wall Street Journal. All is not lost!
ReplyDeleteThe public sector lacks the political will to reign in the price structure. The private sector largely the basis for negotiations on what Medicare pays.
ReplyDeleteLarge puts it all together, someone should! Thanks:)
ReplyDeleteThe first time he promoted his previous work as evidence that saturated fat was the trigger. I sent an email asking how he thought and he sent his work - which is mentioned only once saturated fat, not on anything important.
ReplyDeleteThe "well-informed" person to whom you respond is just evidence that it's awfully difficult to get people to understand when their paycheck depends on them not understanding.
ReplyDeleteSome of the posts are always attractive like the one you have shared with us.
ReplyDeleteMedical Interior Design